The video in question depicted explicit content, including scenes of wet dreams, erections, and ejconcerned father found it highly inappropriate for fourth-grade students like his daughter Sofia. While the video was eventually removed from the website, Sofia’s teacher denied any sexual nature in the lessons, claiming that sex education was not being taught to her year group. Mr. Doherty firmly believes that parental consent should be obtained before exposing children to such sensitive topics.
Michael Doherty, a concerned father from Suffolk, took a bold step by removing his daughter from her primary school due to what he considered highly inappropriate sex education lessons. He believes that the lessons were not suitable for children of her age and wanted to protect his daughter from exposure to explicit content. This decision was not taken lightly, as he felt it was necessary to take action to safeguard his daughter’s innocence and wellbeing.
The teachings in question included topics such as orgasms and even anal sex, which Mr. Doherty found shocking and worrisome. He was alarmed to discover that these lessons were mandatory in schools across the UK, leaving him with limited options for his daughter’s education. When he approached the school to see the teaching materials, he was informed that they were unable to share specifics due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. This lack of transparency only fueled his concerns as a parent.
Furthermore, Mr. Doherty learned that the teaching resources, including a controversial video produced by the BBC, were provided to the school by an external charity called the PSHE Association. This revelation underscored the importance of parental involvement in decision-making processes regarding the materials taught in classrooms. Mr. Doherty believes that parents should be consulted and have a say in what their children are exposed to at school.
